(

JPLTX

)

Large Cap Value Fund

Defensive Large-Cap Value Equities
NAV As of 02/14/19 $12.94

Jump to a section

Fund Facts

Details Performance (As of 02/14/19) Morningstar (As of 01/31/19)
12/31/08 Inception Date
$96.66M Total Net Assets (As of 01/31/19)
GROSS 0.88%
NET 0.78%
Annual Expense Ratio
(As of fiscal year end 06/30/18)
Morningstar Fee Level (As of 01/31/19)
Fee Level Group
Large Cap No Load
(out of 910 funds)
Morningstar Fee Level Below Average
View Morningstar Fee Level
-0.31% 1 Day Return
10.41% YTD Return
Category
Large Value
LARGE VALUE
LARGE BLEND
LARGE GROWTH
MID VALUE
MID BLEND
MID GROWTH
SMALL VALUE
SMALL BLEND
SMALL GROWTH
Equity Style Box *
Important Morningstar Information

Overview

Client Commitment

As defensive value specialists, we look to invest in high-quality companies with strong management teams, stable balance sheets and durable competitive advantages that are trading at attractive valuations. We seek to achieve excess returns over full market cycles, with less risk than our benchmark and peers as measured by standard deviation, beta and down market capture.

Why Invest in the Fund

    Attractive Reward/Risk

  1. Our disciplined valuation process measures downside risk before upside potential and invests in securities with favorable reward/risk ratios.
  2. High-Conviction Process

  3. The portfolio typically holds between 40 to 60 stocks with business fundamentals considered more important than fluctuations in the wider economy.
  4. Different Than the Benchmark

  5. The benchmark is not used as a starting point for portfolio construction, which should lead to high active share.

Featured Insights

Performance

RETURNS

(As of 12/31/2018)
(As of 01/31/2019)
Inception: Dec 31, 2008 3M YTD 1YR 3YR 5YR 10YR Since Inception
Large Cap Value Fund – T Shares -12.33% -8.74% -8.74% 5.38% 4.61% 9.56% 9.56%
Russell 1000® Value Index -11.72% -8.27% -8.27% 6.95% 5.95% 11.18% 11.18%
Inception: Dec 31, 2008 3M YTD 1YR 3YR 5YR 10YR Since Inception
Large Cap Value Fund – T Shares 0.40% 8.45% -4.57% 9.76% 6.92% 11.29% 10.36%
Russell 1000® Value Index 0.34% 7.78% -4.81% 11.62% 8.33% 13.39% 11.91%
Returns quoted are past performance and do not guarantee future results; current performance may be lower or higher. Investment returns and principal value will vary; there may be a gain or loss when shares are sold.
View Fees and Expenses
Performance for Class T Shares that includes periods prior to 7/6/09 reflects the performance of one or more share classes of the Fund or a predecessor fund, adjusted, where applicable and permitted, for differing fees and expenses. See the Fund’s prospectus for further details concerning historical performance.

MORNINGSTAR PERCENTILE

(As of 12/31/2018)
(As of 01/31/2019)
1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR SINCE INCEPTION
Percentile Ranking (%) 52 80 72 83 83
Large Value Category
Rank/Count
608/1266 937/1195 755/1100 794/960 794/960
1 YR 3 YR 5 YR 10 YR SINCE INCEPTION
Percentile Ranking (%) 37 86 76 84 81
Large Value Category
Rank/Count
399/1267 1007/1200 798/1105 795/963 768/963

CALENDAR YEAR PERFORMANCE

GROWTH OF A $10,000 HYPOTHETICAL INVESTMENT

Source: Morningstar, Inc.
This graph compares fund performance to that of the fund’s Morningstar category average and benchmark(s).

RETURNS-BASED STATISTICS

(As of 01/31/19 CLASS I SHARES)

RISK / REWARD
VS. RUSSELL 1000® VALUE INDEX

3 YEAR 5 YEAR
Information Ratio -0.72 -0.54
Alpha -1.29 -0.83
Tracking Error 2.36 2.35
Beta 0.98 0.96
R-Squared (%) 95.62 95.55

UP AND DOWN MARKET CAPTURE (%)
VS. RUSSELL 1000® VALUE INDEX

3 YEAR 5 YEAR
Up Capture Ratio 91.85 91.88
Down Capture Ratio 100.55 97.94

STANDARD DEVIATION

3 YEAR 5 YEAR
Large Cap Value Fund 11.21 10.93
Russell 1000® Value Index 11.18 11.16

SHARPE RATIO

3 YEAR 5 YEAR
Large Cap Value Fund 0.79 0.59
Russell 1000® Value Index 0.94 0.69

ANNUAL FEES & EXPENSES

(As of Fiscal Year End, 06/30/18)

CLASS T SHARES
Management Fees 0.47%
12b-1 Fees -
Other Expenses 0.41%
Total Gross Expenses 0.88%
Waivers -0.10%
Total Net Expenses 0.78%
Net expense ratios reflect the expense waiver, if any, contractually agreed to through 11/1/19.

Characteristics

Index represents the Russell 1000® Value Index.

TOP HOLDINGS

(As of 01/31/2019)

% of Fund
Oracle Corp 4.24
Procter & Gamble Co 3.79
Equity Residential 3.77
Johnson & Johnson 3.68
US Bancorp 3.53
Chubb Ltd 3.33
Evergy, Inc. 2.99
Chevron Corp 2.75
Crown Holdings Inc 2.67
Wells Fargo & Co 2.63
TOTAL 33.38

PORTFOLIO CHARACTERISTICS

(As of 01/31/19)

FUND INDEX
Number of Holdings
Equity Issues
51
724
Market Capitalization
Weighted Average
$106.17B
$121.10B
Portfolio Turnover Rate
(1-year trailing)
27.58%
-
Price/Earnings Ratio
(1-year forward)
15.25
16.24
Price/Book Ratio
(1-year forward)
2.49
2.50
Earnings Growth Rate
(1-year forward)
9.29%
10.51%

DEVELOPED VS. EMERGING MARKET

(As of 01/31/19)

% OF FUND % OF INDEX
U.S. 89.63 99.27
Non-U.S. Developed 7.93 0.61
Cash & Equivalents 2.44 -

SECTOR ALLOCATION

(As of 01/31/19)

% OF FUND % OF INDEX
Financials 28.80 22.72
Health Care 12.57 15.15
Consumer Staples 11.56 7.78
Industrials 9.20 7.67
Energy 8.60 9.59
Information Technology 7.57 9.25
Utilities 5.66 6.26
Real Estate 4.29 5.16
Communication Services 4.19 7.06
Materials 4.00 4.02
Consumer Discretionary 1.12 5.34
Cash & Equivalents 2.44 -

MARKET CAPITALIZATION RANGE OF EQUITY HOLDINGS

(As of 01/31/2019)

% OF FUND % OF INDEX
Over $100B 33.81 40.53
$50B to $100B 21.43 16.33
$10B to $50B 33.63 30.97
$5B to $10B 8.69 8.44

REGIONAL ALLOCATION

(As of 01/31/19)

% OF FUND % OF INDEX
North America 90.95 99.27
Europe 5.48 0.59
Africa/Mideast 1.13 -
Cash & Equivalents 2.44 -

Commentary & Literature

4Q18 Portfolio Commentary Highlights

  • Holdings in energy and consumer discretionary detracted from relative returns, while stock selection in financials and industrials aided performance.
  • The Fund remains underweight the information technology and consumer discretionary sectors and overweight in financials and consumer staples.
  • We have been selective buyers on market weakness, but we believe patience is key given high volatility and economic uncertainty.

Read The Full Commentary